ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted systems of care for infectious diseases-including tuberculosis-and has exposed pervasive inequities that have long marred efforts to combat these diseases. The resulting health disparities often intersect at the individual and community levels in ways that heighten vulnerability to tuberculosis. Effective responses to tuberculosis (and other infectious diseases) must respond to these realities. Unfortunately, current tuberculosis programmes are generally not designed from the perspectives of affected individuals and fail to address structural determinants of health disparities. We describe a person-centred, equity-oriented response that would identify and focus on communities affected by disparities, tailor interventions to the mechanisms by which disparities worsen tuberculosis, and address upstream determinants of those disparities. We detail four key elements of the approach (data collection, programme design, implementation, and sustainability). We then illustrate how organisations at multiple levels might partner and adapt current practices to incorporate these elements. Such an approach could generate more substantial, sustainable, and equitable reductions in tuberculosis burden at the community level, highlighting the urgency of restructuring post-COVID-19 health systems in a more person-centred, equity-oriented way.
ABSTRACT
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries, the need for simple, accessible and frequent diagnostic testing grows. In lower-resource settings, case detection is often limited by a lack of available testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To address global inequities in testing, alternative sample types could be used to increase access to testing by reducing the associated costs. Saliva is a sensitive, minimally invasive and inexpensive diagnostic sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection that is appropriate for asymptomatic surveillance, symptomatic testing and at-home collection. Saliva testing can lessen two major challenges faced by lower- and middle-income countries: constrained resources and overburdened health workers. Saliva sampling enables convenient self-collection and requires fewer resources than swab-based methods. However, saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics has not been implemented on a large scale in low- and middle-income countries. While numerous studies based in these settings have demonstrated the usefulness of saliva sampling, there has been insufficient attention on optimizing its implementation in practice. We argue that implementation science research is needed to bridge this gap between evidence and practice. Low- and middle-income countries face many barriers as they continue their efforts to provide mass COVID-19 testing in the face of substantial inequities in global access to vaccines. Laboratories should look to replicate successful approaches for sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, while governments should act to facilitate mass testing by lifting restrictions that limit implementation of saliva-based methods.
La maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) continue à affecter les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire de manière disproportionnée, accentuant le besoin en tests diagnostiques simples, accessibles et fréquents. Dans les endroits disposant de ressources limitées, la détection des cas se heurte souvent au manque de tests disponibles pour le syndrome respiratoire aigu sévère (SARS-CoV-2). Afin de lutter contre les inégalités mondiales en la matière, d'autres types d'échantillons pourraient être exploités, dans le but d'améliorer l'accès au dépistage tout en diminuant les frais qu'il engendre. Les échantillons de salive offrent une méthode de diagnostic fiable, peu invasive et peu coûteuse pour détecter le SARS-CoV-2. Cette méthode est compatible avec le suivi des personnes asymptomatiques, le dépistage des personnes symptomatiques et la collecte d'échantillons à domicile. Les tests salivaires permettent d'atténuer deux problèmes majeurs rencontrés par les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire: une pénurie de ressources et des soignants surmenés. En outre, les patients peuvent effectuer le prélèvement eux-mêmes et cette méthode nécessite moins de moyens que celle reposant sur l'écouvillonnage. Pourtant, les tests salivaires de détection du SARS-CoV-2 n'ont pas été déployés à grande échelle dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire. Malgré les nombreuses études démontrant l'utilité des tests salivaires dans ces régions, les perspectives d'optimisation de leur mise en Åuvre n'ont suscité que peu d'attention. Dans le présent document, nous affirmons que des recherches scientifiques sur leur exécution sont requises pour combler ce fossé entre les faits et la pratique. Les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire sont confrontés à une multitude d'obstacles dans leurs efforts de dépistage massif de la COVID-19. Et ce, en dépit des profondes inégalités qu'ils subissent dans le monde en matière d'accès aux vaccins. Les laboratoires devraient tenter de reproduire les approches les plus efficaces pour détecter le SARS-CoV-2 dans la salive, tandis que les gouvernements devraient prendre des mesures favorisant un dépistage de masse en levant les restrictions qui entravent le déploiement des tests salivaires.
A medida que la enfermedad por coronavirus de 2019 (COVID-19) sigue afectando de manera desproporcionada a los países de ingresos bajos y medios, crece la necesidad de realizar pruebas de diagnóstico sencillas, accesibles y frecuentes. En entornos de bajos recursos, la detección de casos suele estar limitada por la falta de pruebas disponibles para diagnosticar el coronavirus del síndrome respiratorio agudo grave de tipo 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Para abordar las desigualdades globales en las pruebas, se podrían utilizar tipos de muestra alternativos para aumentar el acceso a las pruebas reduciendo los costes asociados. La saliva es una muestra de diagnóstico sensible, poco invasiva y económica para la detección del SARS-CoV-2 que es apropiada para la vigilancia asintomática, las pruebas sintomáticas y la obtención en el hogar. Las pruebas de saliva pueden reducir dos de los principales problemas a los que se enfrentan los países de ingresos bajos y medios: la escasez de recursos y la sobrecarga de trabajo del personal sanitario. La toma de muestras de saliva permite realizar fácilmente la obtención por cuenta propia y requiere menos recursos que los métodos con hisopos. Sin embargo, las pruebas de saliva para el diagnóstico del SARS-CoV-2 no se han aplicado a gran escala en los países de ingresos bajos y medios. Aunque varios estudios realizados en estos entornos han demostrado la utilidad del muestreo de saliva, no se ha prestado suficiente atención a la optimización de su aplicación en la práctica. En este sentido, se considera que la investigación científica sobre la implementación es necesaria para subsanar esta deficiencia entre la evidencia y la práctica. Los países de ingresos bajos y medios se enfrentan a muchas dificultades en sus esfuerzos por realizar pruebas masivas en relación con la COVID-19, a pesar de las grandes desigualdades en el acceso global a las vacunas. Los laboratorios deberían intentar reproducir los enfoques que han tenido éxito para la detección sensible de la infección por el SARS-CoV-2 en la saliva, mientras que los gobiernos deberían actuar para facilitar las pruebas masivas eliminando las restricciones que limitan la aplicación de los métodos de diagnóstico salival.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , Saliva , COVID-19 Testing , Developing Countries , COVID-19/diagnosisABSTRACT
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to disproportionately affect low- and middle-income countries, the need for simple, accessible and frequent diagnostic testing grows. In lower-resource settings, case detection is often limited by a lack of available testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). To address global inequities in testing, alternative sample types could be used to increase access to testing by reducing the associated costs. Saliva is a sensitive, minimally invasive and inexpensive diagnostic sample for SARS-CoV-2 detection that is appropriate for asymptomatic surveillance, symptomatic testing and at-home collection. Saliva testing can lessen two major challenges faced by lower- and middle-income countries: constrained resources and overburdened health workers. Saliva sampling enables convenient self-collection and requires fewer resources than swab-based methods. However, saliva testing for SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics has not been implemented on a large scale in low- and middle-income countries. While numerous studies based in these settings have demonstrated the usefulness of saliva sampling, there has been insufficient attention on optimizing its implementation in practice. We argue that implementation science research is needed to bridge this gap between evidence and practice. Low- and middle-income countries face many barriers as they continue their efforts to provide mass COVID-19 testing in the face of substantial inequities in global access to vaccines. Laboratories should look to replicate successful approaches for sensitive detection of SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, while governments should act to facilitate mass testing by lifting restrictions that limit implementation of saliva-based methods.
ABSTRACT
Worldwide, non-adherence to tuberculosis (TB) treatment is problematic. Digital adherence technologies (DATs) offer a person-centered approach to support and monitor treatment. We explored adherence over time while using DATs. We conducted a meta-analysis on anonymized longitudinal adherence data for drug-susceptible (DS) TB (n = 4515) and drug-resistant (DR) TB (n = 473) populations from 11 DAT projects. Using Tobit regression, we assessed adherence for six months of treatment across sex, age, project enrolment phase, DAT-type, health care facility (HCF), and project. We found that DATs recorded high levels of adherence throughout treatment: 80% to 71% of DS-TB patients had ≥90% adherence in month 1 and 6, respectively, and 73% to 75% for DR-TB patients. Adherence increased between month 1 and 2 (DS-TB and DR-TB populations), then decreased (DS-TB). Males displayed lower adherence and steeper decreases than females (DS-TB). DS-TB patients aged 15–34 years compared to those >50 years displayed steeper decreases. Adherence was correlated within HCFs and differed between projects. TB treatment adherence decreased over time and differed between subgroups, suggesting that over time, some patients are at risk for non-adherence. The real-time monitoring of medication adherence using DATs provides opportunities for health care workers to identify patients who need greater levels of adherence support.
ABSTRACT
Since 2012, the World Health Organization has recommended household contact investigation as an evidence-based intervention to find and treat individuals with active tuberculosis (TB), the most common infectious cause of death worldwide after COVID-19. Unfortunately, uptake of this recommendation has been suboptimal in low- and middle-income countries, where the majority of affected individuals reside, and little is known about how to effectively deliver this service. Therefore, we undertook a systematic process to design a novel, theory-informed implementation strategy to promote uptake of contact investigation in Uganda, using the COM-B (Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior) model and the Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) framework. We systematically engaged national, clinic-, and community-based stakeholders and collectively re-examined the results of our own formative, parallel mixed-methods studies. We identified three core behaviors within contact investigation that we wished to change, and multiple antecedents (i.e., barriers and facilitators) of those behaviors. The BCW framework helped identify multiple intervention functions targeted to these antecedents, as well as several policies that could potentially enhance the effectiveness of those interventions. Finally, we identified multiple behavior change techniques and policies that we incorporated into a multi-component implementation strategy, which we compared to usual care in a household cluster-randomized trial. We introduced some components in both arms, including those designed to facilitate initial uptake of contact investigation, with improvement relative to historical controls. Other components that we introduced to facilitate completion of TB evaluation-home-based TB-HIV evaluation and follow-up text messaging-returned negative results due to implementation failures. In summary, the Behavior Change Wheel framework provided a feasible and transparent approach to designing a theory-informed implementation strategy. Future studies should explore the use of experimental methods such as micro-randomized trials to identify the most active components of implementation strategies, as well as more creative and entrepreneurial methods such as human-centered design to better adapt the forms and fit of implementation strategies to end users.